fbpx

S-REITs given a lifeline with extension of timeline for distributing 90% income and higher 50% leverage limit

REIT, Singapore

Written by:

Alvin Chow

I talked about the potential dividend cut of 48% for S-REITs in the previous article.

And I said that there’s a risk that S-REITs may fail some of the criteria.

First, due to lower income and relief to the tenants, REITs may have to cut their dividends to survive the cash flow crunch. But that may lead to their inability to fulfil the 90% distributable income requirement to qualify for tax transparency.

Second, property valuation may come down and this would increase the gearing ratio even if the REITs do not increase their debt, thereby increasing the risk of breaching the 45% gearing ratio limit.

And I said that rules can be changed:

Rules are set by humans and can be altered if they do not make sense anymore, especially in extreme situations like Covid-19. So I believe the rules for REITs will be relaxed if needed, albeit temporarily.

Truth be told. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) acted faster than I expected, announcing a suite of rule changes for S-REIT on 16 Apr 2020.

#1 – S-REITs have 1 more year to meet the 90% distributable income to qualify for tax transparency

This rule change is necessary to help REITs with their cash flows. SPH REIT was the first to announce dividend cuts to conserve cash. Without this rule, REITs might have to pay taxes for failing to distribute 90% of their income.

REITs now can delay FY2020’s distribution by a year. This means that REITs with their FY ending on 31 Mar 2020, 30 Jun 2020, 30 Sep 2020 and 31 Dec 2020 will only need to meet the 90% distribution by 31 Mar 2021, 30 Jun 2021, 30 Sep 2021 and 31 Dec 2021 respectively.

Here’s a list of their deadlines for 90% income distribution (excluded Lendlease REIT, Elite Com REIT and Utd Hampshire REIT as they are recent IPOs):

#2 – Increase leverage limit from 45% to 50%, and defer the Interest Coverage Ratio requirement

This rule is to create more debt room for REITs in case they need additional funding to boost their cash flows.

There are currently 3 REITs (ESR REIT, Cache Log Trust and SoildbuildBiz REIT) which have gearing ratio of 40% or more. The increase in debt room would help. But if it isn’t sufficient, they can also issue rights as SGX Regco has increased the limit of equity issues up to 100% of the share capital.

MAS’s original intention was to couple the increased leverage limit with a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of 2.5. This is to ensure the REITs can generate sufficient income to pay interest.

MAS decided to delay implementing the ICR. Most of the REITs have been able to cross the minimum ICR of 2.5, some more comfortable than the others.

Dasin Retail Trust and Sabana REIT failed the ICR at 1.1 and 2.3 respectively. Mapletree NAC Trust and Suntec REIT just barely passed the ICR at 2.5 and 2.9 respectively.

Here’s the table of REITs and the respective data that are relevant to the announced changes. Some caveats too

  • Excluded Lendlease REIT, Elite Com REIT and Utd Hampshire REIT as they are recent IPOs
  • ICR was taken from the respective REIT’s presentations. Asterisks indicate that those were taken from Shareinvestor.com as ICRs were unavailable from the REITs themselves.
  • ICR was taken from the latest quarter and it can fluctuate in other quarters.
NameCodeDeadline for 90% distributionDebt-to-assetInterest Cover
AIMS APAC REITO5RU31-Mar-2139%5.0
ARA H Trust USDXZL31-Dec-2132%4.5
Ascendas iTrustCY6U31-Mar-2129%3.6
Ascendas REITA17U31-Mar-2138%5.1
Ascott REITHMN31-Dec-2136%5.6
BHG Retail REITBMGU31-Dec-2129%6.6*
Cache Log TrustK2LU31-Dec-2143%3.8
CapitaCom TrustC61U31-Dec-2128%5.6
CapitaMall TrustC38U31-Dec-2130%4.7
CapitaR China TrustAU8U31-Dec-2137%5.0
CDL H TrustJ8531-Dec-2136%6.1
Cromwell REIT EURCNNU31-Dec-2137%8.6
Cromwell REIT SGDCSFU31-Dec-2137%8.6
Dasin Retail TrustCEDU31-Dec-2136%1.1*
Eagle H Trust USDLIW31-Dec-2137%14.2*
EC World REITBWCU31-Dec-2138%3.9*
ESR REITJ91U31-Dec-2144%3.7
Far East H TrustQ5T31-Dec-2137%3*
First REITAW9U31-Dec-2134%5.0
Frasers Centrepoint TrustJ69U30-Sep-2129%5.9
Frasers Com TrustND8U30-Sep-2129%5.7
Frasers H TrustACV30-Sep-2135%5.7
Frasers L&I TrustBUOU30-Sep-2138%9.9
Frasers L&I Trust AUDBWQU30-Sep-2138%9.9
IREIT GlobalUD1U31-Dec-2136%10.4
KepPacOak REIT USDCMOU31-Dec-2137%4.8
Keppel DC REITAJBU31-Dec-2131%13.3
Keppel REITK71U31-Dec-2129%3.8
Lippo Malls TrustD5IU31-Dec-2135%4.1
Manulife REITBTOU31-Dec-2138%3.8
Mapletree Com TrustN2IU31-Mar-2133%4.4
Mapletree Ind TrustME8U31-Mar-2131%6.8
Mapletree Log TrustM44U31-Mar-2137%5.2
Mapletree NAC TrustRW0U31-Mar-2137%2.5
OUE Com REITTS0U31-Dec-2139%3.3
ParkwayLife REITC2PU31-Dec-2137%14.1
Prime US REITOXMU31-Dec-2133%5.5
Sabana REITM1GU31-Dec-2137%2.3*
Sasseur REITCRPU31-Dec-2127%4.8
SoilbuildBiz REITSV3U31-Dec-2140%3.5
SPH REITSK6U31-Aug-2130%6.2*
Starhill Global REITP40U30-Jun-2136%3.6
Suntec REITT82U31-Dec-2136%2.9

Conclusion

REITs have been given a lifeline and surviving COVID-19 shouldn’t be an issue anymore. They are also in a better position to help tenants and are expected to do so. Unit holders have to be prepared for dividends to be cut in the meantime.

The dividends should come back up in 2021 given that the timeline is being extended rather than lowering the 90% distributable income requirement. That’s the saving grace for unit holders.

Some REITs that are relatively higher geared and have lower interest coverage ratios would benefit less from these changes. However, they can still tap on unit holders through rights issues if required.

6 thoughts on “S-REITs given a lifeline with extension of timeline for distributing 90% income and higher 50% leverage limit”

  1. Do you calculate the debt/asset manually or extract from other source? As there are different from aggregate leverage/gearing value from SREITs result.

    Reply
    • Debt/Asset was taken from a data site. So there could be some differences. Initially I took the ICR from data site too but realised the way REITs calculate it is quite different, excluding the valuation gains rather than the classic EBIT/Interest Expense formula.

      Reply
      • The data site seems providing inaccurate info, some notable one are Aims difference by 4%, BHG difference by 6%, Capitaland Comm difference by 7%, Keppel Reit by 6% and Sabana by 6%. There are quite some numbers differences by 3%.

        For ICR, so far I found no standardized calculation for SREITs, some use NPI/interest expenses, some even include valuation gain. I think it would better to manually calculate EBITDA/interest expenses for apple to apple comparison.

        By the way, I am a long term reader of your blog. If you don’t mind, you could take basic data from my humble basic SREITs screener at https://reit-tirement.blogspot.com/p/sreit-data.html.

        Reply
          • For gearing, I direct get from their result presentation. As for ICR, if provided figure is not from EBITDA, then I will manually calculate. If they never mentioned is either EBITDA or NPI, then would have manually calculate to verify also.

  2. Been watching this discussion keenly because this is a very important metric for a REIT Investor, especially if he is a long term REIT Investor. ICR is most relevant when days like this arrives before us. During good times, certainly this number is not too critical, but not today.
    EBITDA means Earnings Before Interests, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation. I believe to have a safe practice to cover the Interest to be paid, we have to remove the Taxes from the equation. Depreciation and Amortisation are Non-Cash in nature and may be omitted. Then we divide the available cash in-hand out to get the ICR ratio.

    CK Lai.

    Reply

Leave a Comment